Public Source
Consistency Audit
Independently compare XK Network's public sources and report factual inconsistencies, broken links, or unclear disclosures. This is a documentation task—not a promotion, investment activity, or security audit.
Objective
Create a reproducible record showing whether the official website, Litepaper, GitHub, X, Telegram, BscScan page, and deployed contract agree on the project name, token symbol, network, supply, decimals, contract address, official links, team identity, and risk disclosures.
Required deliverable
Submit one Markdown report containing:
- The review date and every URL checked.
- A table of each factual field and the value found at every source.
- Broken links, contradictions, ambiguous statements, or missing disclosures.
- Evidence links or screenshots for every reported issue.
- A short severity label: critical, important, or minor.
Acceptance criteria
- All sources in scope are checked.
- Claims are supported by publicly accessible evidence.
- Facts and opinions are clearly separated.
- No fabricated engagement, transactions, endorsements, vulnerabilities, or identities.
- The report contains no seed phrases, private keys, passwords, or unnecessary personal data.
Submission and review
Use the dedicated Mission #001 audit form. The form collects the review date, sources checked, comparison table, findings, severity, and evidence in a consistent public record. The project owner will acknowledge the submission, verify cited evidence, and publish the review outcome in the repository.
Open the audit form ↗Reward and legal status
No token, payment, equity, employment, or future reward is promised for this mission. Participation is voluntary. Any future incentive must be announced with defined terms before work begins.